what would the community think...
"In the end we forget everything, anyway. We're human; we're amnesia machines."
Subliminal.
A decision is made then the next day or so the entire conversation happens again as if no one remembers.
I hope the play is necessarily re-written through the vocal, bodily, spatial practices of the actors and the rest of the performance / technical team. Theatre is, and always has been profoundly and necessarily heteroglossic,
even though the prism of the dominant paradigm has led us to see it as the product of one voice (traditionally that of the writer, more recently the director). It was surely the effect of that prism and ignorance of actors creative processes
that led Bakhtin to claim that the theatre was monologic, for I would argue that the relation between text and performance in text-based theatre is fundamentally, paradigmatically dialogic. That is to say that the performance is a 'structure in
relation to another structure', which is Kristeva's definition of the dialogic.
Subliminal.
A decision is made then the next day or so the entire conversation happens again as if no one remembers.
I hope the play is necessarily re-written through the vocal, bodily, spatial practices of the actors and the rest of the performance / technical team. Theatre is, and always has been profoundly and necessarily heteroglossic,
even though the prism of the dominant paradigm has led us to see it as the product of one voice (traditionally that of the writer, more recently the director). It was surely the effect of that prism and ignorance of actors creative processes
that led Bakhtin to claim that the theatre was monologic, for I would argue that the relation between text and performance in text-based theatre is fundamentally, paradigmatically dialogic. That is to say that the performance is a 'structure in
relation to another structure', which is Kristeva's definition of the dialogic.




